btw, i'm not going to argue with them, because then they might force me and
others like me to pay for service contracts without newsgroup (or
internet)
access. how about one of you folks who are lawyers starting a class action
lawsuit for all Verizon customers who have had their services cut without
legal grounds other than whim and bandwidth saving while leaving the same
access for their business customers.
http://policyblog.verizon.com/PolicyBlog/Blogs/policyblog/EricRabe9/488/Upcoming-Changes-in-Verizon-s-Newsgroup-Service.aspx
obviously the news admin at verizon is out of bounds, so is the management
for providing different tiers of service without adequate notice (i.e.
enough time for most of us to get out of our service contracts.).
Cheers!
Doc
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doc Martian" <docmartian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups: 0.verizon.newsgroup.requests
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 3:14 AM
Subject: p.s. Re: REM: rec.kids.breastfeeding
> "Doc Martian" <docmartian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:4up7k.119450$G33.95434@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Given the recent Verizon decisions regarding how
>> alt.walter-cronkite.i-like-to.move-it.move-it (and a vast number of
other
>> alt newsgroups) could possibly foment kiddy ****. I think its certain
>> that
>> Verizon executives will agree with me that the explicit reference to
kids
>> and breastfeeding in the newsgroup rec.kids.breastfeeding is in clear
>> violation of Verizon's newsgroup policies. Please remove this group so
>> its
>> not used as an excuse to delete other rec newsgroups.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Doc Martian
>
> I do understand that breastfeeding is a women's right issue; however,
this
> newsgroup is clearly by its own newsgroup title about RECREATIONAL
> breastfeeding of kids and as such, is clearly in violation of Verizon
> policies. As such, please delete it swiftly.
>
> Thank you,
> Doc
>
|
